Directives - CPL 02-00-035 - CPL 2.35 CH-16 - Changes to the Standard Alleged Violation Elements (SAVEs) Manual for the Asbestos standard
 Directives - Table of Contents |
| • Record Type: | Instruction |
| • Directive Number: | CPL 02-00-035 |
| • Old Directive Number: | CPL 2.35 CH-16 |
| • Title: | Changes to the Standard Alleged Violation Elements (SAVEs) Manual for the Asbestos standard |
| • Information Date: | 02/28/1991 |
| • Standard Number: | 1910.1001 |
U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance Subject: Changes to the Regulatory and General Industry Standard AllegedViolation Elements (SAVEs) Manual A. Purpose. This instruction transmits revised and new pages to theRegulatory and General Industry SAVEs Manual for "Occupational Exposure toAsbestos, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and Actinolite." B. Scope. This instruction applies OSHA-wide. C. Action. Regional Administrators and Area Directors shall ensure thatall compliance personnel:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance D. Background. Final rule and regulations for 29 CFR 1910.1001,Occupational Exposure to Asbestos, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and Actinolitewere published in the Federal Register, Vol. 51, No. 119, on June 20, 1986.
E. State Plan States. Regional Administrators shall advise Statedesignees of the action required by this instruction and encourage theirparticipation in the SAVEs program. Patricia K. Clark, Director Directorate of Compliance Programs DISTRIBUTION: National, Regional, and Area Offices Compliance OfficersState Designees Area Office Clericals 11(c)/405 Programs NIOSH RegionalProgram Directors OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that no employeewas exposed to an airborne concentration of asbestos, tremolite,anthophyllite, actinolite, or a combination of these minerals in excess of0.2 fiber per cubic centimeter of air as an eight (8)-hour time-weightedaverage (TWA) as determined by the method prescribed in Appendix A of thissection or by an equivalent method:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(c)(2): The employer did not ensure that no employeeis exposed to an airborne concentration of asbestos, tremolite,anthophyllite, actinolite, or a combination of these minerals, in excess of1.0 fiber per cubic centimeter of air (1 f/cc) as averaged over a samplingperiod of thirty (30) minutes:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(1)(i): Determinations of employee(s) were not madefrom breathing zone air samples that were representative of the 8-hour TWAand 30-minute short-term exposures of each employee:
OPTION 1 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(1)(ii): Representative 8-hour TWAemployee exposures were not determined on the basis of one or more samplesrepresenting full-shift exposures for each shift for each employee in eachjob classification in each work area:
OPTION 2 2 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(1)(ii): Representative 30-minuteshort-term employee exposures were not determined on the basis of one or moresamples representing 30 minute exposures associated with operations that aremost likely to produce exposures above the excursion limits for each shiftfor each job classification in each work area:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(2)(i): Each employer did not perform initialmonitoring of employees who were, or could reasonably be expected to beexposed to airborne concentrations at or above the action level and/orexcursion limits:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance OPTION 1 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(3): Samples were not of such frequencyand pattern as to represent with reasonable accuracy the levels of exposureof the employees:
OPTION 2 2 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(3): Sampling was at intervals greaterthan six months for employees whose exposure could reasonably be foreseen toexceed the action level and/or excursion limits:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(5): Notwithstanding the provisions of 29 CFR1910.1001(d)(2)(ii) and 29 CFR 1910.1001 (d)(4), the employer did notinstitute the exposure monitoring required whenever there was a change inproduction, process, control equipment, personnel or work practices that mayresult in new or additional exposures above the action level and/or excursionlimits or when the employer had reason to suspect that a change could haveresulted in new or additional exposures above the action level and/orexcursion limits:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(6)(i): All samples taken to satisfy the monitoringrequirements of 29 CFR 1910.1001(d) were not personal samples collectedfollowing the procedures specified in Appendix A:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(6)(ii): All samples taken to satisfy themonitoring requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1001(d) were not evaluated using theOSHA Reference Method (ORM) specified in Appendix A, or an equivalentcounting method:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(6)(iii)(A): The employer using an equivalentmethod to the ORM did not ensure that the replicate exposure data used toestablish equivalency was collected in side-by-side field and laboratorycomparisons:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(6)(iii)(B): The employee using an equivalentmethod to the ORM did not ensure that comparison indicated that 90% of thesamples collected in the range 0.5 to 2.0 times the permissible limit had anaccuracy range of plus or minus 25 percent of the ORM results with a 95%confidence level as demonstrated by a statistically valid protocol:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(6)(iii)(C): The equivalent method of documentationdeveloped by the employer and/or results of the comparison testing was notmaintained:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(6)(iv): The employer did not use the results ofmonitoring analysis performed by laboratories which had instituted qualityassurance programs that included the elements as prescribed in Appendix A:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(7)(i): The employer did not, within 15 workingdays after receipt of the results of any monitoring performed under thestandard, notify the affected employees of these results in writing eitherindividually or by posting of results in an appropriate location that wasaccessible to the affected employees:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(7)(ii): The written notification required by 29CFR 1910.1001(d)(7)(i) did not contain the corrective action being taken bythe employer to reduce employee exposure to or below the PELs, whenevermonitoring results indicated the 8-hour TWA and/or the excursion limits hadbeen exceeded:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(e)(1): The employer did not establish regulated areaswherever airborne concentrations of asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite,actinolite, or a combination of these minerals were in excess of the 8-hourTWA and/or excursion limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(c):
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(e)(2): Regulated areas were not demarcated from therest of the workplace in any manner that minimized the number of persons whowould be exposed to asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(e)(3): Access to regulated areas was not limited toauthorized persons or to persons authorized by the Act or regulations issuedpursuant thereto:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(e)(4): Each person entering a regulated area was notsupplied with and required to use a respirator, selected in accordance with29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(2):
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(e)(5): The employer did not ensure that employees didnot eat, drink, smoke, chew tobacco or gum, or apply cosmetics in theregulated areas:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(l)(i): The employer did not institute engineeringand work practices to reduce and maintain employee exposure to or below theexposure limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(c), except to the extent thatsuch controls was not feasible:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(l)(ii): Wherever the feasible engineering controlsand work practices that could be instituted were not sufficient to reduceemployee exposure to or below the permissible exposure limits prescribed in29 CFR 1910.1001(c), the employer did not use them to reduce employeeexposure to the lowest levels achievable by these controls and/or did notsupplement them by the use of the respiratory protection that complied withthe requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1001(g):
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(l)(iii): For the following operations, whereverfeasible engineering controls and work practices that could be institutedwere not sufficient to reduce the employee exposure to or below thepermissible exposure limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(c), the employerdid not use them to reduce employee exposure to or below 0.5 fiber per cubiccentimeter of air (as an eight-hour time-weighted average) or 2.5 fibers/ccfor 30 minutes (short-term exposure) and did not supplement them by the useof any combination of respiratory protection that complied with therequirements of 29 CFR 1910.1001(g), work practices and feasible engineeringcontrols that would reduce employee exposure to or below the permissibleexposure limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(c):
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(l)(iv): Local exhaust ventilation and dustcollection systems were not designed, constructed, installed, and maintainedin accordance with good practices such as those found in the AmericanNational Standard Fundamentals Governing the Design and Operation of LocalExhaust Systems, ANSI Z9.2-1979:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(l)(v): All hand-operated and power-operated toolswhich would produce or release fibers of asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite,actinolite, or a combination of these minerals so as to expose employees tolevels in excess of the exposure limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(c),such as, but not limited to, saws, scorers, abrasive wheels, and drills, werenot provided with local exhaust ventilation systems which complied with 29CFR 1910.1001(f)(l)(iv):
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(l)(vi): Insofar as practicable, asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite was not handled, mixed, applied,removed, cut, scored, or otherwise worked in a wet state sufficient toprevent the emission of airborne fibers which exposed employees to levels inexcess of the exposure limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(c), where theusefulness of the product would not be diminished thereby:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(1)(viii): Asbestos cement, mortar, coating, grout,plaster or similar material containing asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, oractinolite was not removed from bags, cartons, or other containers in whichthey are shipped without being either wetted, or enclosed, or ventilated soas to prevent effectively the release of airborne fibers of asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite, actinolite, or a combination of these minerals soas to expose employees to levels in excess of the limits prescribed in 29 CFR1910.1001(c):
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(1)(ix): Compressed air was used to removeasbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite,or actinolite or materials containingasbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite,or actinolite, where the compressed airwas not used in conjunction with a ventilation system designed to capture thedust cloud created by the compressed air:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(2)(i): Where the PELs were exceeded, the employerdid not establish and implement a written program to reduce employee exposureto or below the TWA and/or below the excursion limits by means of engineeringand work practice controls as required by 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(1), and did notuse respiratory protection where required or permitted under this section:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(2)(ii): Written program was not reviewed andupdated as necessary to reflect significant changes in the status of theemployer's compliance program:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(2)(iii): Written program was not submitted uponrequest for examination and copying to the affected employees and designatedemployee representatives:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(f)(2)(iv): The employer used employee rotation as ameans of compliance with the TWA and/or excursion limits:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(1)(i): Respirators were not provided and usedwhere required during the interval necessary to install or implement feasibleengineering and work practice controls:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(1)(ii): Respirators were not provided and usedwhere required in work operations, such as maintenance and repair activities,or other activities for which engineering and work practice controls were notfeasible:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(1)(iii): Respirators were not provided and used inwork situations where feasible engineering and work practice controls werenot yet sufficient to reduce exposure to or below the exposure limits:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(1)(iv): The employer did not provide respirators,and ensure that they were used, where required in emergencies:
OPTION 1 2 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(2)(i): Where respirators were required,the employer did not select and provide, at no cost to the employee, theappropriate respirator as specified in Table 1:
OPTION 2 3 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(2)(i): The employer did not selectrespirators from among those jointly approved as being acceptable forprotection by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and theNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) under theprovisions of 30 CFR Part 11:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(2)(ii)(A): The employer did not provide a poweredair-purifying respirator in lieu of any negative pressure respiratorspecified in Table 1 when an employee chose to use this type of respirator:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not provide a poweredair-purifying respirator in lieu of any negative pressure respiratorspecified in Table 1 whenever this respirator would provide adequateprotection to the employee:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(3)(i): Where respiratory protection was required,the employer did not institute a respirator program in accordance with 29 CFR1910.134(b), (d), (e), and (f):
OPTION 1 4 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(3)(ii): The employer did not permit eachemployee who uses a filter respirator to change the filter elements wheneveran increase in breathing resistance was detected:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance OPTION 2 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(3)(ii): The employer did not maintain anadequate supply of filter elements for the employee's use:
OPTION 1 3 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(3)(iv): The employee was assigned totasks requiring the use of a respirator when, based on his or her most recentexamination, an examining physician had determined that the employee would beunable to function normally wearing a respirator, or that the safety orhealth of the employee or other employees would be impaired by the use of arespirator:
OPTION 2 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(3)(iv): The employee found by anexamining physician to be unable to wear a respirator was not assigned toanother job or given the opportunity to transfer to a different positionwhose duties he or she was able to perform with the same employer, in thesame geographical area and with the same seniority, status, and rate of paythe employee had just prior to such transfer.
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(4)(i): The employer did not ensure that therespirator issued to the employee exhibited the least possible facepieceleakage and that the respirator was fitted properly:
OPTION 1 3 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(4)(ii): For each employee wearing anegative pressure respirator, the employer did not perform eitherquantitative or qualitative face fit tests at the time of initial fitting andat least every six months thereafter:
OPTION 2 4 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(4)(ii): The qualitative fit tests wereused for testing the fit of half-mask respirators where they were permittedto be worn, and tests were not conducted in accordance with Appendix C:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(1): Where an employee was exposed to asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite, actinolite, or a combination of these mineralsabove the TWA and/or the excursion limits, or where the possibility of eyeirritation exists, the employer did not provide at no cost to the employeeand ensure that the employee used appropriate protective work clothing andequipment:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(1)(i): Coveralls or similar full-body workclothing were not provided by the employer for employees protection whenrequired:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(1)(ii): Gloves, head coverings and foot coveringswere not provided by the employer for employee's protection when required:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(1)(iii): Face shields, vented goggles, or otherappropriate protective equipment provided by the employer to employees didnot meet the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.133:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that employeesremoved work clothing contaminated with asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite,or actinolite only in change rooms provided in accordance with 29 CFR1910.1001(i)(1):
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that noemployee took contaminated work clothing out of the change room, except thoseemployees authorized to do so for the purpose of laundering, maintenance, ordisposal:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(2)(iii): Contaminated work clothing was not placedand stored in closed containers which prevented dispersion of the asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite and actinolite outside the container:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(2)(iv): Containers of contaminated protectivedevices or work clothing which were to be taken out of change rooms or theworkplace for cleaning, maintenance, or disposal did not bear labels inaccordance with 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(2):
OPTION 1 2 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(3)(i): The employer did not clean,launder, repair, or replace protective clothing and equipment required tomaintain their effectiveness:
OPTION 2 3 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(3)(i): The employer did not provide cleanprotective clothing and equipment at least weekly to each affected employee:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(3)(ii): The employer did not prohibit the removalof asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite from protectiveclothing by blowing or shaking:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(3)(iii): Laundering of contaminated clothing wasnot done so as to prevent the release of airborne fibers of asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite, actinolite, or a combination of these minerals inexcess of the permissible exposure limit prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(c):
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(3)(iv): The employer gave contaminated clothing toanother person for laundering and did not inform the person of therequirement in 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(3)(iii) to effectively prevent the releaseof airborne fibers of asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, actinolite, or acombination of these minerals in excess of the permissible exposure limits:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(3)(v): The employer did not inform the person wholaunders or cleans protective clothing or equipment contaminated withasbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, actinolite, of the potentially harmfuleffects of exposure to asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(h)(3)(vi): Contaminated clothing was not transportedin sealed impermeable bags, or other closed, impermeable containers, andlabeled in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1001(j):
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(1)(i): The employer did not provide clean changerooms for employees who worked in areas where their airborne exposure toasbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, actinolite, or a combination of theseminerals was above the TWA and/or excursion limits:
OPTION 1 3 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure thatchange rooms were in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.141(e):
OPTION 2 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure thatchange rooms were equipped with two separate lockers or storage facilities,so separated as to prevent contamination of the employee's street clothesfrom his protective work clothing and equipment:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that employeeswho worked in areas where their airborne exposure was above the TWA and/orexcursion limit shower at the end of the work shift:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(2)(ii): The employer did not provide showerfacilities which complied with 29 CFR 1910.141(d)(3):
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(2)(iii): The employer did not ensure thatemployees who were required to shower pursuant to 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(2)(i)did not leave the workplace wearing any clothing or equipment worn during thework shift:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(3)(i): The employer did not provide lunchroomfacilities for employees who work in areas where their airborne exposure wasabove the TWA and/or excursion limit:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(3)(ii): The employer did not ensure that lunchroomfacilities had a positive pressure, filtered air supply, and were readilyaccessible to employees:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(3)(iii): The employer did not ensure thatemployees who worked in areas where their airborne exposure was above the TWAand/or excursion limit washed their hands and faces prior to eating, drinkingor smoking:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(3)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employeesdid not enter lunchroom facilities with protective work clothing or equipmentunless surface asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite fibers hadbeen removed from the clothing or equipment by vacuuming or other methodsthat removed dust without causing the asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite oractinolite to become airborne.
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(i)(4): The employer did not ensure that employees donot smoke in work areas where they are occupationally exposed to asbestosbecause of activities in that work area:
OPTION 1 3 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(1)(i): Warning signs were not providedand displayed at each regulated area:
OPTION 2 4 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(1)(i): Warning signs were not posted atall approaches to the regulated area so that an employee could read the signsand could take necessary protective steps before entering the area:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(1)(ii): The warning signs required by 29 CFR1910.1001(j)(1)(i) did not bear the following information:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(1)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employeesworking in and contiguous to regulated areas comprehended the warning signsrequired to be posted by 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(1)(i):
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(2)(i): Warning labels were not affixed to all rawmaterials, mixtures, scrap, waste, debris, and other products containingasbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite fibers, or to theircontainers:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(2)(ii): The labels did not comply with therequirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) of OSHA's Hazard Communication Standardand did not include the following information:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(3): Employers who are manufacturers or importersof asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite or asbestos, tremolite,anthophyllite, or actinolite products, did not comply with the requirementsregarding development of material safety data sheets as specified in 29 CFR1910.1200(g) of OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard, except as provided by29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(4):
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(i): The employer did not institute a trainingprogram for all employees who were exposed to airborne concentrations ofasbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, actinolite, or a combination of theseminerals at or above the action level and/or excursion limit:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(ii): Training was not provided prior to or atthe time of initial assignment and at least annually thereafter:
OPTION 1 2 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(iii): The training program was notconducted in a manner which the employee was able to understand:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(iii) * : The employer did not ensure thateach employee was informed of: (** ENTER APPROPRIATE OPTION):
OPTION 2 (A) The health effects associated with asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite exposure: OPTION 3 (B) The relationship between smoking and exposure to asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite in producing lung cancer:
OPTION 5 (D) The engineering controls and work practices associated with the employees job assignment: OPTION 6 (E) The specific procedures implemented to protect employees from exposure: OPTION 7 (F) The purpose, proper use, and limitations of respirators and protective clothing: OPTION 8 (G) The purpose and a description of the medical surveillance program required by 29 CFR 1910.1001(1): OPTION 9 (H) The content of this standard, including appendices:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance OPTION 10 (I) The name, addresses and phone numbers of public health organizations which provide information, materials, and/or conduct programs concerning smoking cessation: OPTION 11 (J) The requirements for posting signs and affixing labels and the meaning of required legends for such signs and labels:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(iv)(A): The employer did not make a copy ofthis standard and its appendices readily available without cost to allaffected employees:
OPTION 1 2 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(iv)(C): The employer did not informall employees concerning the availability of self-help smoking cessationprogram materials:
OPTION 2 3 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(iv)(C): Upon employee request, theemployer did not distribute such materials, consisting of NIH PublicationNo.89-1647, or equivalent self-help materials, which is approved or publishedby a public health organization listed in Appendix I:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(k)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free aspracticable of accumulations of dusts and waste containing asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite:
5 29 CFR 1910.1001(k)(2): All spills and sudden releases of materialcontaining asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite were not cleanedup as soon as possible:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(k)(3): Surfaces contaminated with asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite were being cleaned by the use ofcompressed air:
OPTION 1 2 29 CFR 1910.1001(k)(4): HEPA-filtered vacuuming equipment wasnot used for vacuuming:
OPTION 2 3 29 CFR 1910.1001(k)(4): The equipment was not used andemptied in a manner which minimized the reentry of asbestos, tremolite,anthophyllite, or actinolite into the workplace:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(k)(5): Shoveling, dry sweeping and dry clean-up ofasbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite was not prohibited wherevacuuming and/or wet cleaning was feasible:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(k)(6): Waste, scrap, debris, bags, containersequipment, and clothing contaminated with asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite,or actinolite consigned for disposal, were not collected and disposed of insealed impermeable bags, or other closed, impermeable containers:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(1)(i): The employer did not institute a medicalsurveillance program for all employees who were or would be exposed toairborne concentrations of fibers of asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite,actinolite, or a combination of these minerals at or above the action leveland/or excursion limit:
OPTION 1 3 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(1)(ii)(A): The employer did not ensurethat all medical examinations and procedures were performed by or under thesupervision of a licensed physician:
OPTION 2 4 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(1)(ii)(A): Medical examinations were notprovided without cost to the employee and at a reasonable time and place:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(1)(ii)(B): Persons other than licensed physicians,who administered the pulmonary function testing required by this section, didnot complete a training course in spirometry sponsored by an appropriateacademic or professional institution:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(2)(i): Before an employee was assigned to anoccupation exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos, tremolite,anthophyllite, actinolite fibers, a preplacement medical examination was notprovided or made available by the employer:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(2)(ii): A preplacement medical examination did notinclude, as a minimum, a medical and work history; a complete physicalexamination of all systems with emphasis on the respiratory system; thecardiovascular system and digestive tract; completion of the respiratorydisease standardized questionnaire required by Appendix D, Part 1, and/orAppendix E of this section:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(3)(i): Periodic medical examinations were not madeavailable annually:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(4)(i): The employer did not provide or makeavailable a termination of employment medical examination for any employeewho was exposed to airborne concentrations of fibers, asbestos, tremolite,anthophyllite, actinolite, or a combination of these minerals at or above theaction level and/or excursion limit:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(6): The employer did not provide to the examiningphysician all the elements listed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(6)(i) through 29 CFR1910.1001 (l)(6)(v):
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(7)(i): The employer did not obtain a writtensigned opinion covering all the elements listed in 29 CFR1910.1001(l)(7)(i)(A) through 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(7)(i)(C) from the examiningphysician:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(7)(iii): The employer did not provide a copy ofthe physician's written opinion to the affected employee within 30 days fromits receipt:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(1)(i): The employer did not keep an accuraterecord of all measurements taken to monitor employee exposure to asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite or actinolite as prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(d):
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(1)(ii)(A): The employer did not keep an accuraterecord of the date of measurements taken to monitor employee exposure toasbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite or actinolite as prescribed in 29 CFR1910.1001(d):
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(1)(ii)(B): The employer did not keep an accuraterecord of all measurements taken to monitor employee exposure which includedthe operation involving exposure to asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite oractinolite which was being monitored:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(1)(ii)(C): The employer did not keep an accuraterecord of all measurements taken to monitor employee exposure to asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite or actinolite as prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)which included the sampling and analytical methods used and evidence of theiraccuracy:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(1)(ii)(D): The employer did not keep an accuraterecord of all measurements to monitor employee exposure to asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite or actinolite as prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)which included the number, duration, and results of samples taken:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(1)(ii)(E): The employer did not keep an accuraterecord of all measurements to monitor employee exposure to asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite as prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)which included the type of respiratory protective device worn, if any:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(1)(ii)(F): The employer did not keep an accuraterecord of measurements taken to monitor employee exposure to asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite as prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)which included the name, social security number and exposure of theemployees, whose exposure was represented:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(1)(iii): The employer did not maintain records ofemployee exposure to asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite or actinolite for atleast thirty (30) years, in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.20:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(2)(i): The employer did not establish and maintainan accurate record of objective data reasonably relied upon in support of theprocessing, use, or handling of products made from or containing asbestos,tremolite, anthophyllite or actinolite is exempted from other requirements ofthis section under 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(2)(iii):
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(2)(ii)(A): The employer did not establish andmaintain an accurate record of objective data reasonably relied upon insupport of exemption which included the product qualifying for exemptionunder 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(2)(i):
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not establish andmaintain an accurate record of objective data reasonably relied upon insupport of the exemption which included the source of the objective dataunder 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(2)(i):
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(3)(ii)(A): The employer did not establish andmaintain an accurate record which included the name and social securitynumber of each employee subject to medical surveillance by 29 CFR1910.1001(l)(1)(i) in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.20:
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(3)(ii)(B): The employer did not establish andmaintain an accurate record which included the physicians written opinions ofeach employee subject to medical surveillance by 29 CFR 1910.1001(l)(1)(i) inaccordance with 29 CFR 1910.20:
OSHA Instruction CPL 2.35 CH-16 FEB 28 1991 Office of General IndustryCompliance Assistance 1 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(3)(ii)(C): The employer did not establish andmaintain an accurate record which included any employee medical complaintsrelated to exposure to asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, or actinolite ofeach employee subject to medical surveillance by 29 CFR 1910.1001(1)(1)(i)in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.20:
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(4): The employer did not maintain all employeetraining records for one (1) year beyond the last date of employment of thatemployee:
3 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(5)(ii): The employer, upon request, did not makeexposure records required by 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(1) available for examinationand copying to affected employees, former employees, and designatedrepresentatives in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.20(a)-(e) and (g)-(i):
4 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(5)(iii): The employer, upon request, did not makeemployee medical records required by 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(2) available forexamination and copying to the subject employee, to anyone having thespecific written consent of the subject employee, in accordance with 29 CFR1910:20:
1 29 CFR 1910.1001(m)(6)(i): The employer did not comply with therequirements concerning transfer of records set forth in 29 CFR 1910.20(h):
2 29 CFR 1910.1001(n)(1): The employer did not provide affectedemployees or their designated representatives an opportunity to observe anymonitoring of employee exposure to asbestos, tremolite, anthophyllite, oractinolite conducted in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1001(d):
|
| Directives - Table of Contents |
